A cording your messages I find that you have a good product,but until now I ca no see it efficaty because eny of my web doe not drive traffic,I do not why
I am truly sorry, Brian, but I have not used your service for over a year and I would like to unsubscribe. I have been wasting this money, not your problem, just that I was paying for something that I have not been using for a long while.
Kit Grazioli
That’s what I thought a couple years ago and I quit and used other autoresponders and I have to say I checked back with Trafficwave earlier this year and took a closer look. Trafficwave is more powerful, has more features and tools, and resources, and training than all autoresponders out there, it is why I am back. Also the money you can earn promoting it to others can make it a free system to use. It’s a no brainer. I also have to say in the time I was away Trafficwave has gotten better. Just my opinion but I checked around a lot. Dave
I would say go with version A except for the fast scrolling text during transition between slides. That fast scrolling text irritated me. Version B is clean, but smaller and not quite as catchy. So drop the fast scrolling text in Version A and you have a winner in my book.
I prefer b. I like the fact the header is slightly smaller. The text does need shifting up slightly though to get the small text at the bottom off the border. I am a regular user of Trafficwave but to be honest I don’t promote it as much as i should, I use it for its main purpose – list building
I’m maybe the wrong person to ask. My personal priority is functionality over appearance. When it works (as TW does) GREAT, I don’t need it to be pretty. I know I’m in a less than 5% minority LOL. But… While I defer to your greater marketing experience, I’m not seeing any benefits on either A or B, only features. I’m in FL right now, come on down if you’d like to discuss more Bring the guitar
A.N.Other email marketing program divulged their databases to hackers not once, not twice, but THREE times. At TrafficWave we take You and Your customers’ Privacy and Security Seriously
I agree with Scott Douglas! “A” WITHOUT all those flashing bits that just make your eyes sore!! They’re just plain VERY annoying! Makes the whole thing look cheap!!
I prefer B as I see it as more professional, not flashy crazy like the first one, and I like the information displays quietly yet readily on the blue background with the arrow going upwards as that arrow is very significant … puts a sublime into yee ole brain.
I Prefer A Over B as i feel it has a more personal feel to it and really endears all what trafficwave represents a good honest reliable site that works hard to benefit all its clients
I’m with Scott Douglas on this one. I find that the scrolling text lends an air of anxiety I want to get rid of to the proceedings, but I do prefer the wider text area, so I say stay with “A” rather than go with B as long as the scrolling stops so that I can stop tearing my hair out while kicking back for a leisurely glimpse at the stunning visuals within the box. Now excuse me while I add my backlink before returning to the top of the page in an attempt to remember what I had just written in order to click on “B”. No! I mean “A”! Yeah, “A” . . . “A” it is.
Version B is in my opintion the best. I don’t like flashy sites, and I know that many others share my opinion.
I use traffic exchanges to promote TW, and animated images/sites are disturbing. Many people block them.
Besides, the heading of B takes less space, which is important for people who have more than one window on screen.
Stick to the new version!
I quit and then came back –I am only back a few days but this time I have already created a TW Capture page and set up my letters in the autoresponders—amazed at easy it really is compared to the fear I hard so much trouble overcoming the first time! I am confident I will do great with TW this time around!
I like B best; I think the flash action behind text near the top window appears distracting. I tend to stay focused on the text in B without the distracting motion that appears in A. Content is King. Dave
I must say out of the two A comes out the winner. B pulls my attention, to the small flashing comments in white that are between the dark blue/light purple. To me that distracts my attention from the ad because its not in one spot or the other, and makes me question why it was placed there with such small writing. Although I see it that way it may be attractive to someone else, and pull their eyes where you want them to go. That being said, I think you should make both available, because we all see things differently. But for me A would be my choice.
I have been a customer for the past few years. This summer I became a very active affiliate. I am continually surprised by the power of this product. I like the rotating web site. The other one is too static and boring. Never did like it. But the way, the support department members are great. Very responsive.
I must admit I prefer B as I also do not like the fast scrolling and I joined you when you first started, then left after a while, and came back a month ago.
After using another AR for that time, I still find TW the best and easiest to use, and if you decide to go with A then get rid of the Scrolling. It looks cheap and nasty to me.
I think B looks like a better layout, however which ever one you go with, I would consider putting information about the free trial above the fold, so it is seen without scrolling. In my experience people are more likely to try it for free.
I still prefer A.
B is okay, but a bit quiet, I think. A seems to give out a bit if urgency, which seems to wake the viewer up and seems to give more of a call to action to the viewer.
Just my opinion.
But I agree, the features are what’s going to win people over. I’ve used Aweber, GetResponse, ProAutoresponder (closed down). But what’s most attractive with TW is the 10 tier affiliate program. I am in the process of building a site to take full advantage of this.
If you’re into network marketing, the other autoresponders don’t compare.
Style B furnishes the facts in a less hyped manner for me. By the time I send someone to my site they should ready to enroll, so the facts are all that counts.
I’m an avid fan of Scott Douglas and his TE Profits, but I have to disagree with him and go with my team mate, Grace Randall. IMHO, version B is cleaner and less cluttered. I’m going to agree with Scott here though. It’s the scrolling on the current version that makes my eyes cross and want to move onto to some other site, just to get away, lol.
Wow! TrafficWave just gets better by the week. The tweaks and refinements that have been going on over the last several months enforce the reasons why I make TW my top recommendation to any business owner.
I’ve changed my mind. I went back for a second look and have decided that I do prefer version B. Why? Because it has a more professional appeal. But, I would speed up the scroll a bit to create a sense of urgency and I’m talking fractions of a second here.
I propose to go with version A , the fast scrolling text during transition between slides catches the visitor and holds them.. Version B is clean, and small. It is not quite catchy like A.
Site B – but I have already taken this survey and still see it in my TW login. Also, if you had thought to have the link to the survey open in a new tab or window, that would save everyone having to log back in to TW again. (I never do understand why people don’t think of that!)
I was undecided as well – kept flicking backwards and forwards!
I decided I like B better, clean and more professional and loads much quicker. I also agree with Lawrence above – speed up the scroll in it just a little bit (urgency).
Above the fold in B is the message that needs to be seen:
“If your business is not using autoresponders to build and manage targeted prospect lists, you are losing sales.”
A cording your messages I find that you have a good product,but until now I ca no see it efficaty because eny of my web doe not drive traffic,I do not why
Web sites don’t drive traffic.
Our advertising is what drives traffic to our web sites.
Where and how are you currently advertising, Rolland?
B version is more up-to-date
Be sure to indicate that in your survey responses! Thanks for stopping by and participating.
Hello Brain I like the first lay out better I find it more eye catching.
Be sure to indicate that in your survey responses.
Thanks for taking the time to let us know!
Go with verison A. Cleaner and it makes it more clear that a free trial is available.
Hi, Mike.
Thanks for the feedback!
I am not able to see any difference in how and where the free trial is described. What do you feel makes the free trial more clear in Version A?
I am truly sorry, Brian, but I have not used your service for over a year and I would like to unsubscribe. I have been wasting this money, not your problem, just that I was paying for something that I have not been using for a long while.
Kit Grazioli
Feel free to cancel from within your back office at any time.
We’re certainly sorry to see you not using such powerful tools.
That’s what I thought a couple years ago and I quit and used other autoresponders and I have to say I checked back with Trafficwave earlier this year and took a closer look. Trafficwave is more powerful, has more features and tools, and resources, and training than all autoresponders out there, it is why I am back. Also the money you can earn promoting it to others can make it a free system to use. It’s a no brainer. I also have to say in the time I was away Trafficwave has gotten better. Just my opinion but I checked around a lot. Dave
Agree with comment made already A looks cleaner and not so cramped.
Best of Luck!
I would say go with version A except for the fast scrolling text during transition between slides. That fast scrolling text irritated me. Version B is clean, but smaller and not quite as catchy. So drop the fast scrolling text in Version A and you have a winner in my book.
I am doing the survey now,, A seems to be best for me..
Hi,
I prefer A, i like TRWV logo at the header when its pop up!
Regards,
Achmad K W
I prefer b. I like the fact the header is slightly smaller. The text does need shifting up slightly though to get the small text at the bottom off the border. I am a regular user of Trafficwave but to be honest I don’t promote it as much as i should, I use it for its main purpose – list building
Hi Brian,
I’m maybe the wrong person to ask. My personal priority is functionality over appearance. When it works (as TW does) GREAT, I don’t need it to be pretty. I know I’m in a less than 5% minority LOL. But… While I defer to your greater marketing experience, I’m not seeing any benefits on either A or B, only features. I’m in FL right now, come on down if you’d like to discuss more
Bring the guitar
Keep on keeping on,
Marty
I agree with Marty, this is a great tool and I would concentrate more on it loading quicker than the actual looks of the site – I voted for B
I like (A) it keep me on the page for more than 5 seconds
to see what Traffic Wave has to offer.
e.g.
A.N.Other email marketing program divulged their databases to hackers not once, not twice, but THREE times. At TrafficWave we take You and Your customers’ Privacy and Security Seriously
or
* Avoid getting your clients spammed by hackers *
I like them both but I think “A” has the flash display that will grab the viewers attention more.
Wayne(rustygib:-)
I agree with Scott Douglas! “A” WITHOUT all those flashing bits that just make your eyes sore!! They’re just plain VERY annoying! Makes the whole thing look cheap!!
I like both but am good with A. I have some material out there using that screen shot as well… No changes needed.
I prefer B as I see it as more professional, not flashy crazy like the first one, and I like the information displays quietly yet readily on the blue background with the arrow going upwards as that arrow is very significant … puts a sublime into yee ole brain.
I Prefer A Over B as i feel it has a more personal feel to it and really endears all what trafficwave represents a good honest reliable site that works hard to benefit all its clients
I’m with Scott Douglas on this one. I find that the scrolling text lends an air of anxiety I want to get rid of to the proceedings, but I do prefer the wider text area, so I say stay with “A” rather than go with B as long as the scrolling stops so that I can stop tearing my hair out while kicking back for a leisurely glimpse at the stunning visuals within the box. Now excuse me while I add my backlink before returning to the top of the page in an attempt to remember what I had just written in order to click on “B”. No! I mean “A”! Yeah, “A” . . . “A” it is.
Version B is in my opintion the best. I don’t like flashy sites, and I know that many others share my opinion.
I use traffic exchanges to promote TW, and animated images/sites are disturbing. Many people block them.
Besides, the heading of B takes less space, which is important for people who have more than one window on screen.
Stick to the new version!
I quit and then came back –I am only back a few days but this time I have already created a TW Capture page and set up my letters in the autoresponders—amazed at easy it really is compared to the fear I hard so much trouble overcoming the first time! I am confident I will do great with TW this time around!
Welcome back! And congratulations for taking the steps to push through. Each time you learn, you increase your profitability.
I like B best; I think the flash action behind text near the top window appears distracting. I tend to stay focused on the text in B without the distracting motion that appears in A. Content is King. Dave
Go with Version A) . As you know, dynamic pages tend to re-focus the visitor’s attention.
I must say out of the two A comes out the winner. B pulls my attention, to the small flashing comments in white that are between the dark blue/light purple. To me that distracts my attention from the ad because its not in one spot or the other, and makes me question why it was placed there with such small writing. Although I see it that way it may be attractive to someone else, and pull their eyes where you want them to go. That being said, I think you should make both available, because we all see things differently. But for me A would be my choice.
CSibblies
I have been a customer for the past few years. This summer I became a very active affiliate. I am continually surprised by the power of this product. I like the rotating web site. The other one is too static and boring. Never did like it. But the way, the support department members are great. Very responsive.
I must admit I prefer B as I also do not like the fast scrolling and I joined you when you first started, then left after a while, and came back a month ago.
After using another AR for that time, I still find TW the best and easiest to use, and if you decide to go with A then get rid of the Scrolling. It looks cheap and nasty to me.
I think B looks like a better layout, however which ever one you go with, I would consider putting information about the free trial above the fold, so it is seen without scrolling. In my experience people are more likely to try it for free.
I still prefer A.
B is okay, but a bit quiet, I think. A seems to give out a bit if urgency, which seems to wake the viewer up and seems to give more of a call to action to the viewer.
Just my opinion.
Can we take the retty lady from version A and put her in version B?
A is more catchy
But I agree, the features are what’s going to win people over. I’ve used Aweber, GetResponse, ProAutoresponder (closed down). But what’s most attractive with TW is the 10 tier affiliate program. I am in the process of building a site to take full advantage of this.
If you’re into network marketing, the other autoresponders don’t compare.
If it’s not broke don’t fix it i perfer A
Hi Brian,
I like B and will go back and vote.
B will load quicker which is a challenge for some.
Cheers
Bryan
Hello,
I prefer B as shown.
But much better than that would be A without the blurred background on the left of the top blue area.
I voted for option B, it appear more modern and the animation doesn’t stall when i load the page unlike the current (option A)
Style B furnishes the facts in a less hyped manner for me. By the time I send someone to my site they should ready to enroll, so the facts are all that counts.
Tell me how to get peoples to GO TO MY WEBSITE! HOW TO GET ORDER. THE BEST WAY TO DO THAT! LET ME NOW!
First step: Promote your web site via advertising.
I’m an avid fan of Scott Douglas and his TE Profits, but I have to disagree with him and go with my team mate, Grace Randall. IMHO, version B is cleaner and less cluttered. I’m going to agree with Scott here though. It’s the scrolling on the current version that makes my eyes cross and want to move onto to some other site, just to get away, lol.
Wow! TrafficWave just gets better by the week. The tweaks and refinements that have been going on over the last several months enforce the reasons why I make TW my top recommendation to any business owner.
I’ve changed my mind. I went back for a second look and have decided that I do prefer version B. Why? Because it has a more professional appeal. But, I would speed up the scroll a bit to create a sense of urgency and I’m talking fractions of a second here.
Hello,
I propose to go with version A , the fast scrolling text during transition between slides catches the visitor and holds them.. Version B is clean, and small. It is not quite catchy like A.
I agree do away with the fast text as it puts me in mind of the small text in contracts. A is my choice.
My choice is site A. I think the pictures give it a warmer look. Site B seems a little more ‘corporate’.
I agree that site B loads quicker and has more updated info, but those enhancements could be integrated into site A.
Hi, Like Donna Gain and Scott Douglas Said, First i like A. Second I agree with Scott.. Keep up the good work.
Site B – but I have already taken this survey and still see it in my TW login. Also, if you had thought to have the link to the survey open in a new tab or window, that would save everyone having to log back in to TW again. (I never do understand why people don’t think of that!)
I was undecided as well – kept flicking backwards and forwards!
I decided I like B better, clean and more professional and loads much quicker. I also agree with Lawrence above – speed up the scroll in it just a little bit (urgency).
Above the fold in B is the message that needs to be seen:
“If your business is not using autoresponders to build and manage targeted prospect lists, you are losing sales.”
I like both but am good with A. I have some material out there using that screen shot as well… No changes needed.